TBG-363

Blackrock ETF? - unZapped - Dominance - Mayor/President?

June 17, 2023 · YouTube · All episodes
TBG-363 cover frame

Where the panel landed

Would BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF filing pull Bitcoin further into the financial system it was built to route around?

The panel partially agreed that BlackRock had a better chance than prior applicants, but split on whether that was good for Bitcoin. Dan Eve saw BlackRock's size, ETF record, and Coinbase custody choice as making approval plausible; Victoria Jones and Josh Scigala treated the ETF as another path toward price manipulation, bad custody, and legacy-finance capture.

PessimisticMixedOptimistic
The panel expected near-term upside and even consensus higher prices, but the discussion was repeatedly shadowed by custody risk, market manipulation, political capture, and institutional dependence.

What they were watching

The panel landed on short-term constructive direction, with Dan, Victoria, and Josh all answering higher for the following week. Price levels were mentioned organically in the dominance discussion, including Bitcoin's prior move from $20,000 down to $3,000 after 2017 and from $60,000 to $20,000 in the later cycle, plus Dan's note that an earlier ETF rejection came after a move from about $600 to $3,500.

BlackRock Reopens The Spot ETF Ritual

The episode began with BlackRock filing for a spot Bitcoin ETF using Coinbase as custodian. Dan argued that BlackRock's record and influence made this application more serious than earlier attempts, while Victoria warned that ETFs could create the same kind of paper-market manipulation long associated with gold.

Custody, Capture, And Wall Street Gravity

The panel treated the ETF as both validation and danger. Josh pushed the hardest against legacy-finance attachment, arguing that if Bitcoin ties itself too closely to the mainstream system, it risks being dragged along with that system during stress.

Apple, Damus, And Lightning Zaps

The second issue centered on Apple threatening Damus over Lightning tips on Nostr. Victoria saw Apple as defending its app-store revenue model against a tide it could not hold back, while Josh and Dan framed the dispute as another case of closed platforms limiting user choice in the name of security and control.

Tipping Fatigue And Micropayment Memory

The conversation widened from zaps into a long institutional memory of Bitcoin tipping: ChangeTip, Reddit bots, Brave, ProTip, and QR-code experiments. The panel generally distinguished useful micropayments for articles from socially pressured tipping, with Victoria and Josh arguing that constant small asks become annoying, unpredictable, and manipulative.

Bitcoin Dominance Without The Market-Cap Theology

Bitcoin dominance rising toward 50% prompted a split between market metrics and first-principles thinking. Josh dismissed dominance as secondary to Bitcoin's core properties, Dan called market cap a questionable yardstick for uncapped or easily issued assets, and Victoria argued that a dominant monetary standard matters if Bitcoin is to become a fairer trade mechanism.

Bitcoin-Adjacent Politics Returns

The panel discussed Miami mayor Francis Suarez entering the Republican presidential race after his Bitcoin salary headlines and MiamiCoin experiment. Josh dismissed the campaign as unlikely against Trump and DeSantis, while Dan and Victoria warned that Bitcoin being coded as partisan money would be a strategic mistake.

The Government's Seized Bitcoin Treasury

The bonus issue asked why the United States government still holds so much seized Bitcoin. Dan speculated that a small Bitcoin hedge could make sense for a state facing dollar weakness, Victoria joked that it might help with the debt, and Josh compared the government to a shitcoiner holding Bitcoin while its own token declines.

Predictions, Projects, And The Sports Detour

In the closing segment, Dan chose BlackRock ETF approval as his prediction, Victoria promoted her poverty-line newsletter, and Josh updated the audience on The Standard launching on Arbitrum. Thomas then turned to the Oakland A's reverse boycott and the mechanics of franchise relocation, ending the show in the familiar territory of money, cartels, and inherited power.

I do love that we've been at this long enough where Dan has his favorite ETF rejection.— Thomas Hunt
my spy decences say it's a recipe for manipulation, I don't trust it whatsoever.— Victoria Jones
we're building this thing to be the alternative to the mainstream system.— Josh Scigala
king can you sitting at the tide trying to. Hold it back not going to work.— Victoria Jones
Bitcoin will always be dominant in my mind— Josh Scigala
it's market cap just seems like a really arbitrary measurement— Dan Eve

Story of the Week

BlackRock Brings The ETF Question Back

The BlackRock filing dominated the episode because it reopened an old Bitcoin Group ritual with a different kind of applicant. The panel had seen ETF hype before, including the old rejected bids, but BlackRock's scale and political-financial reach made this one harder to dismiss. That plausibility also made the concerns sharper: Coinbase custody, fractional reserve, price manipulation, and Bitcoin's entanglement with the very system it was meant to outlast. The episode's real argument was not whether Wall Street could sell Bitcoin exposure, but what Bitcoin becomes when Wall Street does.

maybe they're going to be a traditional cryptocurrency company to actually get us a spot traded ETF.— Dan Eve
The episode closed with Bitcoin once again measuring itself against institutions that would rather custody it, fee it, regulate it, or move the team to Las Vegas.
← Back to The Bitcoin Group