TBG-141

Segwit Activated - Above Market Value - Down Under - Mt. Gox Comeback?

May 12, 2017 · YouTube · All episodes
TBG-141 cover frame

Where the panel landed

Did the WannaCry ransomware outbreak make Bitcoin look guilty, useful, or simply unavoidable in a world of insecure legacy systems?

The panel agreed that Bitcoin did not cause the ransomware outbreak, even though Bitcoin made ransom payment more practical. Blake Anderson and Jeffrey Jones focused on poor security, outdated systems, and the consequences of NSA exploit stockpiling, while Jimmy Song emphasized that ransomware and software trust problems existed before Bitcoin. Tone Vays went further, arguing that leaked backdoors can force companies and users to care about real security instead of relying on government-compromised systems.

PessimisticMixedOptimistic
The panel treated the ransomware story as politically dangerous for Bitcoin’s image, but also as proof that censorship-resistant money and stronger security were now unavoidable.

What they were watching

The panel watched Bitcoin pull back below $1,800 before recovering toward the low $1,700s during the show. Tone and Jeffrey both leaned higher for the next week, arguing that the rally still had room despite the ransomware panic and Bitfinex withdrawal dynamics. Organic levels included $1,600, $1,720, $1,750, $1,800, $2,000, and South Korea’s roughly $2,070 price, with GBTC trading at an even larger premium.

WannaCry And Bitcoin Blame

The opening issue covered the global ransomware outbreak affecting hospitals, FedEx, Russia, Ukraine, Taiwan, and other targets. Blake Anderson jokingly blamed Bitcoin, electricity, and the internet before shifting to the real issue: unpatched systems and weak institutional security. Jimmy Song said the name WannaCry was excellent, but the story was more about NSA tools and operating-system trust than Bitcoin.

NSA Exploits And Backdoors

Tone Vays focused on the NSA angle, arguing that government backdoors and hoarded vulnerabilities predictably become public risks once leaked. Jeffrey Jones called the outbreak the result of three-letter agencies operating with little oversight and failing to disclose vulnerabilities responsibly. The panel treated the exploit leak as an indictment of centralized cyber power, not of Bitcoin.

Security Becomes Mandatory

The panel repeatedly advised users and institutions to upgrade, patch, back up, and move Bitcoin off insecure systems. Blake warned about SMS-based two-factor attacks against known Bitcoiners, while Thomas pointed to hardware wallets and cold storage. The larger theme was that Bitcoin raises the stakes of computer security because digital compromise can now mean direct monetary loss.

Litecoin Activates SegWit

The second issue covered Litecoin activating Segregated Witness before Bitcoin. Jimmy Song called Litecoin a useful testbed for SegWit and Lightning rather than a Bitcoin replacement. Tone and Jeffrey agreed that Litecoin’s price rise made more sense than most altcoin pumps because it was tied to a concrete technical milestone.

Lightning On Litecoin

The panel discussed early Lightning payments on Litecoin and their significance for Bitcoin. Jeffrey emphasized that the first Lightning payment over Litecoin showed instant, low-fee transactions in the wild, while Jimmy said cross-chain atomic swaps between Bitcoin and Litecoin would be a major development if both supported Lightning. Litecoin was framed as both an altcoin and a live laboratory.

Bitcoin Price Spreads

The third issue covered large Bitcoin price premiums in South Korea and GBTC. Tone Vays explained that each exchange has its own liquidity pool, regulatory constraints, and withdrawal risks, which can create large local premiums or discounts. Jimmy added that capital controls, foreign-exchange friction, and local bank access make arbitrage much harder than it looks from a chart.

GBTC And Constrained Supply

Tone argued that GBTC’s premium reflected an extremely constrained supply of tradable shares and demand from retirement accounts. He criticized the SEC for leaving GBTC as a de facto monopoly while rejecting or delaying competing ETF products. The panel treated the premium as both a market signal and a structural distortion.

Australia Fixes Bitcoin Tax

The fourth issue covered Australia removing double taxation on Bitcoin and treating digital currency more like money for tax purposes. Jeffrey Jones saw it as another country beginning a constructive conversation with Bitcoin, while Jimmy described Australia as a possible regulatory testbed for the United States. Tone was less impressed, saying value-added taxes are bad generally and that most profitable Bitcoin activity already lives outside formal rails.

Yeah, it's Bitcoin's fault.— Blake Anderson
this thing has like the best name ever want to cry— Jimmy Song
I love it when these back doors are leaked.— Tone Vays
Bitcoin is going to just wipe through the security of this planet like we've never seen before.— Jeffrey Jones
Litecoin is a good test net right now.— Tone Vays
Bitcoin's the honey badger that doesn't care.— Jeffrey Jones

Story of the Week

WannaCry Makes Security Political

The dominant story was the WannaCry ransomware attack spreading across 99 countries and forcing Bitcoin into the mainstream blame cycle. The panel redirected the issue from Bitcoin to insecure Windows systems, NSA exploit stockpiling, and institutions that failed to patch critical infrastructure. Bitcoin was the payment rail, not the vulnerability, but the optics were still severe because hospitals, shipping companies, and public services were affected. The episode captured a recurring Bitcoin lesson: once digital value exists, bad security becomes expensive in public.

Bitcoin is going to just wipe through the security of this planet like we've never seen before.— Jeffrey Jones
The malware wanted $300, Litecoin wanted SegWit, Australia wanted sane tax rules, and Thomas wanted birthday book money.
← Back to The Bitcoin Group