TBG-120

Circle No Bitcoin - Distributed Ledger Tech - ZCrash Continues - VC Hacked

December 10, 2016 · YouTube · All episodes
TBG-120 cover frame

Where the panel landed

Was Bitcoin being abandoned by companies that never understood it, or clarified by their failure to turn it into regulated settlement infrastructure?

The panel largely agreed that Circle’s retreat from Bitcoin buying and selling was not a failure of Bitcoin but a failure of Circle’s original premise. Tone Vays argued that Jeremy Allaire had never understood or wanted Bitcoin as peer-to-peer electronic cash, while Thomas Hunt compared Circle’s model to AOL’s walled garden on top of the open internet. On distributed-ledger technology, Tone and Thomas agreed that banks and consultants were stripping away proof-of-work and calling ordinary databases blockchains.

PessimisticMixedOptimistic
The episode was optimistic about Bitcoin’s distinctiveness and price stability, but pessimistic about regulated Bitcoin startups, enterprise blockchain hype, ICO incentives, and Zcash’s launch economics.

What they were watching

The directional consensus was that Bitcoin itself was steady and structurally stronger than the surrounding companies and altcoin projects. No formal price prediction segment appeared, but Tone described the price around 770 as stable and used it as contrast against collapsing speculative tokens. Zcash’s fall below 50 dollars was treated as a predictable result of launch hype meeting supply reality.

Circle Pulls Bitcoin Buying

Circle’s decision to remove Bitcoin buying and selling led the panel to revisit whether the company ever understood Bitcoin. Tone argued that Circle wanted identity-linked payments from the start, while Thomas said Circle had built a walled garden that users would eventually abandon for direct Bitcoin use.

Bitcoin As Settlement Theater

Circle’s claim that it would still use Bitcoin in the background for settlement was met with skepticism. Tone called the idea nonsensical for trusted company-to-company transfers and doubted anyone outside Circle would be able to verify whether they continued using Bitcoin at all.

Distributed Ledger Tech Returns

The Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan, Deloitte, and SETL stories became examples of institutional interest in distributed ledgers without Bitcoin. Tone saw some progress in the Fed distinguishing distributed-ledger technology from proof-of-work blockchains, but remained frustrated that enterprise vendors called shared databases blockchains.

Blockchain Versus Spreadsheet

Tone emphasized that Satoshi’s blockchain was a proof-of-work chain of transaction blocks, not merely a shared or replicated database. Thomas agreed that corporate medical, dental, and settlement ledgers lack the incentive structure and independent validation that make Bitcoin work.

Ethereum Serves Two Masters

The discussion shifted into Ethereum’s split between speculation and smart contracts. Thomas argued that Ethereum could not serve both the speculators and the code-is-law contract users, while Tone said the post-DAO split showed the speculators had won.

Augur REP Hack

The theft of more than 300,000 dollars in REP tokens from a blockchain VC highlighted weak account security and mobile-number attacks. Tone found parts of the story odd, questioned why REP was targeted, and warned against SMS-based two-factor authentication.

Polychain And Protocol Tokens

The Andreessen Horowitz-backed Polychain fund drew sharp criticism from Tone, who saw it as a fund for early access to token schemes rather than genuine infrastructure. Thomas described it as recreating the early-stock-market insider advantage inside ICOs.

Zcash Falls Below 50 Dollars

Zcash’s continued slide was treated as the predictable aftermath of an overhyped launch with almost no initial supply. Tone argued that Bitcoin’s organic distribution could not be replicated, while Thomas said Zcash may have damaged its own supporters even if the cryptography remained academically interesting.

The future of Bitcoin is not as a digital currency, which seems to just slightly, slightly contradict the title of Satoshi's white paper— Tone Vays
they do this because it allows them to print X amount of open bizarre coins and then sell them— Thomas Hunt
This is the type of story I expected earlier this year on April fools day.— Tone Vays
If you look at all of these other blockchains the health blockchain the dental records blockchain all of these things who's going to upkeep them without a token.— Thomas Hunt
what Bitcoin did is not replicable— Tone Vays
I think we should make it the best we can and the package should be equal— Thomas Hunt

Story of the Week

Circle Leaves The Bitcoin Business

The dominant story was Circle removing Bitcoin buying and selling while trying to present Bitcoin as background settlement technology. Tone treated this as confirmation of what he had written in 2014: Circle wanted identities attached to transactions and did not share Bitcoin’s original peer-to-peer cash premise. Thomas framed Circle, Bitreserve, and similar companies as layers that used Bitcoin for launch credibility before pivoting away and criticizing it. The story mattered because it separated Bitcoin from the businesses that borrowed its name without accepting its design.

Jeremy Alair used the word Bitcoin to get funding.— Tone Vays
The episode closed with Circle leaving, Deloitte arriving, Augur leaking, Zcash falling, and the word blockchain still being asked to explain a spreadsheet.
← Back to The Bitcoin Group