TBG-066

Google Play Suspends Mycelium Wallet – Hong Kong Considers the Banhammer ...

February 14, 2015 · YouTube · All episodes
TBG-066 cover frame

Where the panel landed

Could Bitcoin infrastructure keep maturing while app stores, governments, failed exchanges, and information markets tried to pull it back into older systems of permission and control?

The panel mostly agreed that the week's conflicts were signs of institutional misunderstanding rather than terminal damage. Derek J treated Google's Mycelium suspension as a mistake that could become useful publicity, while Will Pangman identified the donation button as the likely policy trigger and expected the wallet to return. On MyCoin and New York fines, both were skeptical of government protection and government adoption, though Derek was more direct about personal responsibility and state extortion. On Darkleaks, Derek leaned strongly toward information freedom, while Will was more cautious about verification, risk, and possible abuse.

PessimisticMixedOptimistic
The panel was confident that Bitcoin tools and businesses would continue, but the mood was tempered by scams, state opportunism, app-store dependency, and the unfinished ethics of leak markets.

What they were watching

The episode did not revolve around price, and no major organic price levels shaped the discussion. Directionally, the panel watched infrastructure: wallets returning to app stores, lawmakers trying to accept Bitcoin, New Hampshire considering a lighter regulatory posture, and Darkleaks testing a new information market. The consensus was that adoption was proceeding unevenly, with Bitcoin forcing old institutions to reveal their limits while still producing its own hazards.

Mycelium Removed From Google Play

The panel discussed Google's suspension of the Mycelium wallet and treated it as a policy misunderstanding rather than a serious indictment of the software. Derek thought Mycelium could use the episode as publicity, while Will suspected the donation feature was the real issue and expected the wallet to return intact.

MyCoin Collapse In Hong Kong

The Hong Kong MyCoin losses were framed as a likely Ponzi-style exchange failure and a reminder that users must vet businesses carefully. Will argued that scams would continue until more reputable companies became entrenched, while Derek criticized investors who demanded a ban after taking risks without caution.

New York Wants Bitcoin Fines

The New York City proposal to accept Bitcoin for fines and fees drew skepticism. Derek said lawmakers did not understand how much Bitcoin undermined fiat assumptions, while Will noted that government payment systems already pass processing costs to citizens and were trying to look forward-thinking while slowing things down.

Thomas Joins BTCjam

The show paused to acknowledge Thomas Hunt's new role as community manager at BTCjam. Derek and Will treated the continuation of The Bitcoin Group without him as evidence of the World Crypto Network's community structure and Thomas's organizing work.

Darkleaks And Silk Road 2.0 Data

The panel discussed the proposed auction of Silk Road 2.0 data through Darkleaks, including passwords, addresses, private messages, market records, and source code. Derek defended information freedom and saw the tool as a possible WikiLeaks 2.0, while Will questioned whether the alleged data and source were genuine and warned that the first case could be a test or distraction.

Leaks, Power, And The Little Guy

Megan raised the concern that leak tools could harm activists, whistleblowers, or weaker parties as well as governments. Derek responded that information is power and that the answer is better cryptographic literacy, while Will hoped trustless leak markets might also expose real criminals or exonerate people harmed by official allegations.

Foundation Elections And Community Repair

In predictions, Will looked to the Bitcoin Foundation elections and saw the possibility of a radically different organization if candidates such as Olivier Janssens, Bruce Fenton, or Cody Wilson gained influence. He suggested the foundation might move toward consumer advocacy, community outreach, transparency, and less centralized authority.

New Hampshire's Regulatory Contrast

Derek closed with New Hampshire's proposal to accept Bitcoin for taxes and fees while also considering limits on cryptocurrency regulation. He contrasted that with New York's mixed posture, arguing that New Hampshire's lawmakers were closer to the right approach by admitting they did not understand Bitcoin and choosing to stay out of its way.

This is not the final episode of the Bitcoin Group.— Megan Lords
It's not a virus, but it is a fungus, and it is hard to spell.— Megan Lords
If something's too good to be true, it probably is.— Will Pangman
Good luck banning Bitcoin.— Megan Lords
I don't want to spend my Bitcoin in rewarding the state.— Derek J
information is power.— Derek J

Story of the Week

Bitcoin Tools Meet Permissioned Gatekeepers

The dominant story was not one event but a pattern: Bitcoin tools entering spaces controlled by Google, city finance departments, police, exchanges, and courts. Mycelium's removal and return showed how dependent mobile wallets still were on corporate policy interpretation, while New York's proposed Bitcoin fine payments showed government discovering Bitcoin's efficiency without accepting its political implications. The MyCoin collapse supplied the familiar lesson that fraud would be used as an argument for prohibition, and Darkleaks raised the harder question of what happens when information itself becomes a trustless market. With Thomas absent and Megan hosting, the show became a study in Bitcoin's second-order institutions, not its price.

Good luck banning Bitcoin.— Megan Lords
Thomas was gone for the week, the show continued, and the institutions around Bitcoin remained slower than the tools they were trying to contain.
← Back to The Bitcoin Group